Skip to main content
Understanding Risk
  • Events
  • Initiatives
  • Resources
  • Topics
  • News
  • Opportunities
  • About
  • Search
UR on Twitter UR LinkedIn

Reading the tea leaves: When risk models fail to predict disaster impacts

Related Event

  • 2016 Understanding Risk Forum

Related Topics

  • Risk Assessment

Event Summary

Organization: ImageCat & GFDRR

Session Leads

  • Ron Eguchi, ImageCat
  • Alanna Simpson, GFDRR

Speakers

  • Ron Eguchi, ImageCat (chair)
  • Kelvin Berryman, GNS Science
  • David Lallemant, Stanford University
  • Keiko Saito, GFDRR
  • John Bevington, ImageCat
  • Fumio Yamazaki, Graduate School of Engineering Chiba University, Japan

Description

Risk models are built on the best available but often less than ideal data which includes our understanding of the physical expression of hazards, engineering design and construction, etc. and many other factors. It is only when a disaster occurs that we can retrospectively assess how well our risk models performed in predicting the extent and magnitude of disaster impacts. In many cases, our models surprise us with their accuracy, but more often, the scale of the disaster is over or under estimated. Post-disaster forensics offer us a critical path for determining why our risk models fail; however, is this information being effectively utilized to improve our risk models?

This interactive session highlighted cases where risk models were effective in approximating the extent of a disaster damage and where they fell short. Panelists examined the reasons for model efficacy.

Ignite

By Ron Eguchi, ImageCat

GFDRR_Primary Logo_BW-Shade
An initiative of

Connect With Our Community

Join Us on LinkedIn Follow Us on Twitter Subscribe to Our Newsletter

© 2025 Copyright Understanding Risk. Privacy Policy Site Credits